Casework Resources for
Legal Practitioners
Navigate the complexities of the asylum process with confidence. A-PAL is a comprehensive database that equips refugees in the Asia Pacific region with critical resources—including case law, country condition reports, practice guides, and legal memos—to strengthen claims for non-refoulement protection.
Country
Search by country of origin
Client Profile
Search by your client's risk profile
Topic
Search by legal topic or issue
Type of Resource
Search by document type
ASK Case Summary-L-CFI-2023
judicial review; non‑refoulement; right to life; CIDTP; persecution; documentary evidence; interpretation service; procedural fairness; credibility assessment; country of origin information (COI); state protection; internal relocation
casework, lawyer, procedural fairness, caselaw summary
ASK Case Summary-Nazir-Qaisar-CFI-2024
Judicial review; non-refoulement; credibility assessment; procedural fairness; benefit of the doubt; inconsistencies; oral evidence; Torture Claims Appeal Board; Unified Screening Mechanism; Convention Against Torture; UNHCR
casework, lawyer, pakistan, procedural fairness, caselaw summary
ASK Case Summary-WPRK-CFI-2025
Non-refoulement; credibility; vulnerable claimants; mental health; trauma; anxious scrutiny; duty of joint endeavour; adverse inferences; future risk assessment; fresh evidence; procedural fairness; standard of proof;
individualised assessment; Country of Origin Information
casework, lawyer, sri lanka, victim of torture, procedural fairness, caselaw summary
ASK Case Summary-Azubuine-Solomon-Kingsley-COA-2022
Non-refoulement; credibility; vulnerable claimants; mental health; cognitive impairment; trauma; anxious scrutiny; duty of joint endeavour; country conditions; sur place activities; fresh evidence
casework, lawyer, nigeria, victim of torture, procedural fairness, caselaw summary
ASK Case Summary-RE-JASVIR-SINGH-COA-2021
Non-refoulement; judicial review; extension of time; child claimant; minor; child-specific risk; minor-specific non-refoulement grounds; separate consideration of child’s claim; legal representation; Order 80 rule 2; high standard of fairness; oral hearing. The